Algorithm-enhanced English grammar learning: A structured module development approach

Muh Shofiyuddin, Sutama Sutama, Harun Joko Prayitno

Abstract


Grammar is an essential competence for effective communication, yet many students have difficulties understanding and mastering it. This study aims to develop a comprehensive learning module integrating algorithm principles with English grammar to enhance students' grasp of English structure by following a systematic approach encompassing Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE). However, it focused primarily on implementation and evaluation phases. The novelty lies in the implementation of the algorithm principle used to enhance students’ grammar mastery. In this case, English structures are learned through automatic patterns to make them easier to master. Participants included students from the English Education Department at three different universities in Central Java with diverse educational backgrounds, while the product was implemented (limited test) at one of them. A thorough needs analysis revealed that students found that grammar learning was complex and challenging, necessitating simpler, more engaging instructional methods. In response, a targeted product was developed based on these insights. The validation indicated a positive reception of the module, with 66% as "Good," 17% as "Average," and 16% as "Very Good," with no evaluation falling into "Poor" or "Unsatisfactory" categories. These findings suggest that the module is a viable tool for enhancing grammar instruction. Besides, the implementation gained a p-value of 0.004 that meant having significance in using the module. The study not only contributes to the pedagogical framework for teaching English grammar but also highlights the importance of innovative approaches in language education. Further research could explore the long-term impacts of such modules in various learning contexts.


Keywords


Algorithm principles; English structure; grammar-algorithm; learning module; module development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, D., & Arifin, M. A. (2021). Exploring student achievement and perceptions in an online flipped grammar course. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31750

Anggraini, R. T., & Santhoso, F. H. (2017). Hubungan antara gaya hidup hedonis dengan perilaku konsumtif pada remaja [The relationship between a hedonistic lifestyle and consumptive behavior among adolescents]. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP), 3(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.44104

Anthony, W. L., Zhu, Y., & Nower, L. (2021). The relationship of interactive technology use for entertainment and school performance and engagement: Evidence from a longitudinal study in a nationally representative sample of middle school students in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106846

Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 35(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w

Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching, 44(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000339

Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Univ of California Press.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1984). Educational research: An introduction. British Journal of Educational Studies, 32(3), 274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3121583

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews. Sage Publications.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). Longman.

Budiman, B., Ishak, J. I. P., Rohani, R., Lalu, L. M. H., Jaelani, S. R., & Jaelani, M. P. (2023). Enhancing English language proficiency: Strategies for improving student skills. Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology (JSRET), 2(3), 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v2i3.205

Castillo-Cuesta, L. (2020). Using digital games for enhancing EFL grammar and vocabulary in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(20), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i20.16159

Celce-Murcia, M., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Williams, H. A. (1983). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course. Newbury House Rowley.

Cennamo, K., & Kalk, D. (2019). Real world instructional design: An iterative approach to designing learning experiences. Routledge.

Cheung, C.-K. (2016). Media literacy education in China. Springer.

Çiftci, S., & Bildiren, A. (2020). The effect of coding courses on the cognitive abilities and problem-solving skills of preschool children. Computer Science Education, 30(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1696169

Daneshfar, S., Aliasin, S. H., & Hashemi, A. (2018). The effect of dynamic assessment on grammar achievement of Iranian third grade secondary school EFL learners. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 8(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0803.04

Dhananjaya, G. M., Goudar, R. H., Kulkarni, A. A., Rathod, V. N., & Hukkeri, G. S. (2024). A Digital recommendation system for personalized learning to enhance online education: A review. IEEE Access, 12, 34019–34041. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3369901

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: Exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9

Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). Designing modules for learning. In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 1–12). All Ireland Society for Higher Education.

Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Longman.

Effendi, M. S., Rokhyati, U., Rachman, U. A.-M., Rakhmawati, A. D., & Pertiwi, D. (2017). A study on grammar teaching at an English education department in an EFL context. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 5(1), 42–46. http://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.050100

Ellis, R. (1989). Understanding second language acquisition (Vol. 31). Oxford University Press Oxford.

Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society (p. 167). MIT Press.

Grijalva, A. K. A., Herrera, C. C. D., Carrera, M. I. M., & Intriago, É. (2025). Cultivating global citizens: Shifting the focus from grammar to communication in English as a foreign language. Latam: Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(1), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v6i1.3413

Guan, N., Song, J., & Li, D. (2018). On the advantages of computer multimedia aided English teaching. Procedia Computer Science, 131, 727–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.317

Gustafson, K. L. (1991). Survey of instructional development models. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.

Hampp, P. L., Kumayas, T. A., & Lengkoan, F. (2021). Synthesizing grammar and structure problems faced by Indonesian TOEFL participants. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i1.33811

Haohao, M., As’arry, A., Haoyang, Z., Ismail, M. I. S., Ramli, H. R., Zuhri, M. Y. M., & Delgoshaei, A. (2024). Inverse kinematics of six degrees of freedom robot manipulator based on improved dung beetle optimizer algorithm. IAES International Journal of Robotics and Automation (IJRA), 13(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijra.v13i3.pp272-282

Hasibuan, A. S., Hutagalung, R. R., Pane, T. I. L., Fadillah, W., & Lubis, Y. (2024). Students’ difficulty in learning tenses. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ilmu Sosial, 1(11), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11449249

Hasson, N., & Botting, N. (2010). Dynamic assessment of children with language impairments: A pilot study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26(3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659010369282

Hattie, J. (2020). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge.

Heffernan, T. (2023). The history of the university. In T. Heffernan (Ed.), The marginalised majority in higher education: Marginalised groups and the barriers they face (pp. 79–103). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0152-3_4

Huang, S. B., Jeng, Y. L., & Lai, C. F. (2021). Note taking learning system: The use of the learning style theory and the peer learning method on computer programming course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(5), 870–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120971470

Hubalovsky, S., & Korinek, O. (2015). Algorithmic thinking in paradigms of programming. In Recent Advances in Educational Technologies (pp. 48-53) https://www.inase.org/library/2015/zakynthos/bypaper/EDU/EDU-09.pdf

Injadat, M., Moubayed, A., Nassif, A. B., & Shami, A. (2021). Machine learning towards intelligent systems: Applications, challenges, and opportunities. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(5), 3299–3348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09854-1

Kayhan, O., Korkmaz, Ö., & Çakır, R. (2024). How do computational thinking and logical and math thinking skills predict programming self-efficacy? Computers in the Schools, 41(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2312122

Khanahmadi, F., & Sarkhosh, M. (2018). Teacher vs. peer mediated learning of grammar through dynamic assessment: A sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11414a

Kiruthika, P. (2016). The role of grammar in English language teaching. Language in India, 16(4), 30-33. https://languageinindia.com/april2016/kiruthika.pdf

Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.

Kubincová, Z., Hao, T., Capuano, N., Temperini, M., Ge, S., Mu, Y., Fantozzi, P., & Yang, J. (2023). Emerging Technologies for Education. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg.

Kumayas, T., & Lengkoan, F. (2023). The challenges of teaching grammar at the university level: Learning from the experience of English lecturer. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 11(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.53682/eclue.v11i1.6058

Lehmann, T. H. (2024). Mathematical modelling as a vehicle for eliciting algorithmic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10275-4

Li, W. (2021). Role of machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms for teaching reform of linguistics. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(2), 3251–3262. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189365

Malach, J., Kostolányová, K., Chmura, M., Nagyová, I., & Prextová, T. (2016). The conceptual bases for designing module Tools for adaptive learning and learning styles within mooc course ICT tools for e-learning. Відкрите Освітнє Е-Середовище Сучасного Університету, 2, E60–E71. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/oeeemu_2016_2_31.pdf

Marinković, V., & Marić, F. (2024). Interactive textbook for algorithms and data structures. Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Computer Science, 1(1), 29–40. https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=3042-24692401029M

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University.

Mohammadimoghadam, M. (2015). Effects of mediation on an EFL learner’s grammar development: A case study of an EFL beginner student. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.015

Mohammed, A. K., & Ahmed, A. (2014). E-learning environment with problem solving places for teaching and learning of algorithm-oriented concepts. In 2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT) (pp. 17–20). IEEE CONFERENCE PUBLICATIONS.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.

Moylan, R., & Code, J. (2024). Algorithmic futures: An analysis of teacher professional digital competence frameworks through an algorithm literacy lens. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2263732

Napratilora, M., & Siagian, S. Y. (2019). Tenses understanding in using the English language. EJI (English Journal of Indragiri): Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics, 3(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.32520/eji.v3i1.466

Nashoih, A. K., & Darmawan, M. F. (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar Nahwu berbasis kontrastif untuk mengatasi interferensi Bahasa Indonesia terhadap Bahasa Arab [Development of contrastive-based Nahw teaching materials to overcome Indonesian interference in Arabic]. Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 3(2), 335-354. http://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v3i2.1008

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288

Nassif, S. A. (2024). Algorithm literacy among youth: Understanding and navigating social media algorithms. The Egyptian Journal of Media Research, 2024(89), 33–72. https://ejsc.journals.ekb.eg/article_390344.html?lang=en

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Ramachandran, S., Cutchin, S. M., & Fu, S. (2021). Raising algorithm bias awareness among computer science students through library and computer science instruction. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. ASEE. http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--37634

Redelinghuys, Z. (2021). Gamification and simulation teaching--a system created to improve the depth of knowledge and knowledge retention of engineering students [Unpublished doctoral disertation] Stellenbosch University.

Ridley, M. (2024). Informing algorithmic literacy through user folk theories. College & Research Libraries, 85(7), 966. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.7.966

Sacal, P. G. Y., & Potane, J. D. (2023). Students’ mastery of English grammar towards effective writing and speaking competence. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2894–2904. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber04.08.27

Salleh, F. H. M., Drus, S. M., Gunasekaran, S. S., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of course assessments method in determining student’s competency level in programming. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1878(1), 12067. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1878/1/012067/meta

Sari, H., Çevik, M., & Çevik, Ö. (2024). The impact of STEAM (STEM+ arts) activities on learning outcomes in students with specific learning disabilities. Support for Learning, 39(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12462

Schenck, A. (2017). Learning to improve grammar instruction through comprehensive analysis of past research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 55(2), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0038

Schmidt, S. R., & Bohannon, J. N. (1988). In defense of the flashbulb-memory hypothesis: A comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 332-335. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1989-00359-001

Shin, D., Kee, K. F., & Shin, E. Y. (2022). Algorithm awareness: Why user awareness is critical for personal privacy in the adoption of algorithmic platforms? International Journal of Information Management, 65, 102494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102494

Shofiyuddin, M., & Andriyani, S. (2019). Model pembelajaran tenses menggunakan rumus mathematic English (MatEng) [“A tenses-learning model using the MatEng (Mathematic‑English) formula]. AL-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (e-Journal), 4(2), 212–222. https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/al/article/view/851

Shofiyudin, M., Tholhah, F. N., & Mansuro, L. (2023). An analysis of English grammar in the perspective of Nahwu. JALL (Journal Appl Linguist Literacy), 7(1), 55–65. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/jall/article/download/9273/pdf

Sidorov, G. (2013). Syntactic dependency based n-grams in rule based automatic English as second language grammar correction. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 4(2), 169–188. https://www.cic.ipn.mx/~sidorov/IJCLA_SN_GRAMS_2013.pdf

Şimşek, G., Üldeş, A., Taş, Y., & Şimşek, Ö. (2023). The impact of engineering design-based STEM education on students’ attitudes toward STEM and problem-solving skills. Journal of Science Learning, 6(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i3.57193

Sinaga, P., & Setiawan, W. (2022). The impact of electronic interactive teaching materials (EITMs) in e-learning on junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101066

Song, Z., Chen, X., Meng, F., Cheng, G., Wang, C., Sun, Z., & Yin, W.-J. (2020). Machine learning in materials design: Algorithm and application. Chinese Physics B, 29(11), 116103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/abc0e3

Su, J., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in early childhood education: Curriculum design and future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100072

Suri, M. (2020). Pengajaran materi tenses melalui metode students to students dan metode teacher to students [Teaching tenses using a students‑to‑students method and a teacher‑to‑students method]. Journal of Education Science, 6(1), 53–59. http://jurnal.uui.ac.id/index.php/jes/article/view/770

Syafryadin, S. (2021). Teaching grammar through visual illustration for the university students. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(4), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i4.p641-650

Troia, G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction (Document No. IC-5). University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center.

Troussas, C., Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2019). An intelligent adaptive fuzzy-based inference system for computer-assisted language learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.003

Wang, B., Tawfik, A. A., Keene, C. W., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (2024). Transitioning from individuals to groups in knowledge map construction. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09651-z

Widianingsih, N. K. A., & Gulö, I. (2016). Grammatical difficulties encountered by second language learners of English. In Proceedings of the 4th ISELT (ISELT 4) (pp. 141–144). FBS Universitas Negeri Padang.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.

Wu, S., Cao, Y., Cui, J., Li, R., Qian, H., Jiang, B., & Zhang, W. (2024). A comprehensive exploration of personalized learning in smart education: From student modeling to personalized recommendations. J. ACM, 37(4), 111. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.01666

Yi, D. K., Bruno, J. V, Han, J., Zukerman, P., & Steinert-Threlkeld, S. (2022). Probing for understanding of English verb classes and alternations in large pre-trained language models. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2209.04811. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.04811

Youjun, T., & Xiaomei, M. (2022). Computational thinking: A mediation tool and higher-order thinking for linking EFL grammar knowledge with competency. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101143




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v15i1.75803

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.