Revisiting cohesion in academic writing: A corpus-based analysis of EFL learners’ use of conjunctions

Abdulaziz B Sanosi

Abstract


Grammatical and semantic devices writers utilize to maintain text cohesion have received noticeable attention for over forty years. Among the most addressed of these devices are conjunctions, which are believed to improve communication and academic writing quality. While there has been considerable research on how EFL learners utilize conjunctions in their academic writings, the existing body of work remains inadequate. Findings in this strand revealed that EFL learners misuse conjunctions. Based on such findings, learning materials and academic writing programs implemented conjunction instruction techniques. Nevertheless, the persisting problem requires further examination using current research methods and writing conventions. Accordingly, the present study adopted the corpus linguistic method to analyze EFL learners’ use of conjunctions in a 125,000-word corpus and compare it to an equivalent native speaker corpus taking Halliday and Hassan’s categorization as a benchmark for the analysis. It is hypothesized that EFL learners misuse conjunctions in terms of both quantity and quality. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate EFL learners' usage of conjunctions by employing a contemporary research method. This method was expected to demonstrate how current analysis techniques using authentic data can provide meaningful insights remarks into this issue. The study revealed varied uses of conjunctions in the two corpora. However, these variations were not at all levels, as there were observable similarities in some aspects of use in the two corpora. The findings imply updating conjunction instruction and learning materials. Further research adopting corpora and longitudinal approaches is suggested to validate the findings.

Keywords


Academic writing; cohesive devices; conjunction misuse; logical connectors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Shamalat, R., & Abdul Ghani, C. A. (2020). The effect of using conjunction as cohesive device on the undergraduates’ quality of writing in argumentative essays of Jordanian EFL learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Special Issue on CALL No 6, 290-301. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.19

Alawerdy, A. S., & Alalwi, F. S. (2022). Enhancing English as a foreign language university students’ writing through explicit instruction of conjunctions as cohesive devices: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1053310

Anthony, L. (2020). AntFileConverter (version 1.2.1) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Berzina, V., Weill-Tessier, P., & McEnery, A. (2020). #LancsBox (v. 6.0) [Computer software]. http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox

Bhoomanee, C., & Pothisuwan, P. (2020). A corpus-based study: High-frequency use of temporal connectors in written text between native speakers and Thai learners. The Academic Journal: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Nakhonsawan Rajabhat University, 6(2), 1-14. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hssnsru/article/view/240716

Chang, Y. Y., & Swales, J. M. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland, Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 145-167). Routledge.

Egbert, J., & Baker, P. (2020). Introduction. In P. Baker & J. Egbert (Eds.), Using Corpus methods to triangulate linguistic analysis (pp. 1-21). Routledge.

Emurasoft_Inc. (2019). EmEditor Professional (Version 19.3.2) [Computer Software]. Filepuma. https://www.filepuma.com/download/emeditor_professional_64bit_19.3.2-23779/

Granger, S., & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, 15(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x

Gries, S. (2022). Toward more careful Corpus statistics: Uncertainty estimates for frequencies, dispersions, association measures, and more. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 100002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2021.100002

Halliday, M. K., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman Group Limited.

Hassoon, N. H. (2023). Conjunctions in Iraqi media EFL classroom. Social Science Journal, 13(1), 2943-2956. https://resmilitaris.net/issue-content/conjunctions-in-iraqi-media-efl-classroom-1107

He, Z. (2020). Cohesion in academic writing: A comparison of essays in English written by L1 and L2 university students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(7), 761-770. http://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1007.06

Hosseinpur, R. M., & Pour, H. H. (2022). Adversative connectors use in EFL and native students’ writing: A contrastive analysis. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26101a3

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2017). Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes, 45, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.001

Iddir, L., & Laimeche, S. (2020). EFL Students’ Deviation from academic to informal writing: The case of third-year students in the Department of English at Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-ouzou [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Université Mouloud Mammeri Tizi Ouzou.

Jama, I. (2024). Zone of proximal development: Investigating the most usage conjunctions and the common issues written by EFL students at paragraph levels. World Journal of English Language, 14(2), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p109

Kashiha, H. (2022). An investigation of the use of cohesive devices in ESL students’ essay writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(18), 11-19. http://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/13-18-02

Kurniati, R. (2019). Conjunctions in Indonesian undergraduate thesis abstracts. Etnolingual, 3(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.20473/etno.v3i1.12059

Liu, M. (2021). References and conjunctions as cohesive devices in Chinese undergraduate EFL students’ argumentative essays. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(4), 1144-1160. http://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.4.5.1144

Matsuda, P. K., & Nouri, M. (2020). Informal writing and language learning. In M. Dressman, & R. Randall, The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 75-84). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Meyer, C. (2023). English corpus linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/9781107298026

Özçelik, N. (2023). A corpus-based study of conjunction use by the Turkish EFL learners. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(3), 475-483. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8772-0075

Rokhaniyah, H., Adila, W., & Yulianti, D. A. B. (2022). Cohesive devices used in argumentative essays by undergraduate EFL learners. Langkawi Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 8(1), 32-44. http://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.3491

Saeed, L. K. A. (2023). Excessive use of additive conjunctions in the writing of EFL students at tertiary level with ref. to the conjunction and. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 10(2), 43-74. https://www.ijcar.net/assets/pdf/Vol10-No2-February2023/3.-Excessive-Use-of-Additive-Conjunctions-in-the-Writing-of-EFL-Students-at-Tertiary-Level-with-ref.-to-the-Conjunction-And.pdf

Saricaoglu, A., Bilki, Z., & Plakans, L. (2021). Syntactic complexity in learner-generated research paper introductions: Rhetorical functions and level of move/step realization. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101037

Sayah, L., & Hosseini Fatemi, A. (2013). The role of conjunctions in efl learners narrative development. International Journal of education and research, 1(11), 133-146. http://www.ijsac.net/sites/default/files/2021-01/V.5.%20N.12-1-converted.pdf

Shah, M. I., Gasim, H. M., & Sibtain, M. (2021). Locus of conjunctions in academic writing: A corpus-driven approach to developing writing among EFL learners. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 5(2), 432-443. http://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2021(5-II)1.35

Stefanowitsch, A. (2020). Corpus linguistics: A guide to methodology. Language Science Press.

Tocalo, A. W. I., Racman, S. P., Guiamelon, K. N. A. G., & Mama, B. M. (2022). Is Filipino ESL Academic Writing Becoming More Informal?. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 64, 99-125. https://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Images/asset/pasaa_journal/file-2-19-p7nker303128.pdf

Unubi, A. S. (2016). Conjunctions in English: Meaning, types and use. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 4(3), 202-213. https://www.researchpublish.com//upload/book/CONJUNCTIONS%20IN%20ENGLISH-3554.pdf

Xia, G. (2020). A comparable-corpus-based study of informal features in academic writing by English and Chinese scholars across disciplines. Ibérica, 39, 119-140. https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.39.119

Xuanhong, G. (2019). A study of the use of lexical cohesion in Chinese postgraduate writing at a UK university. [Doctoral dissertation, Durham University]. Durham E-Theses Online. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13353/

Yang, B., & Li, W. (2020). Systemic Functional Linguistics: Interaction, methodology, and applicability. In B. Yang, & W. Li (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to grammar, media, and health discourse: Systemic functional and other perspectives (pp. 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4771-3

Yamaai, J. (2023). The effects of explicit instruction and corrective feedback on lexis and cohesion with EFL learners (Publication No. 30812060) [Doctoral dissertation, Temple University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www-proquest-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/pqdtglobal1/dissertations-theses/effects-explicit-instruction-corrective-feedback/docview/2912214190/sem-2?accountid=142908

Zewitra, Z., Bakhti, K. Y., & Ramadhan, M. S. (2023). EFL learners’ tendency in using conjunctions in writings: Evidence from English Diploma-III. Professional Journal of English Education, 6(4), 705-713. https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/project/article/view/17094




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70418

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.