EFL pre-service teachers’ acceptance of ChatGPT for writing: A sequential explanatory mixed-method study

Kastam Syamsi, Arif Nugroho, Isah Cahyani, Woro Retnaningsih

Abstract


This study aims to examine EFL pre-service teachers' acceptance of ChatGPT for their writing. In this context, acceptance refers to the pre-service teachers’ willingness and intention to use ChatGPT as a support tool for their academic writing tasks. A sequential explanatory mixed-method approach was employed, combining a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire with semi-structured interviews. Initially, 143 EFL pre-service teachers from four universities in Surakarta, Indonesia, completed the TAM questionnaire to assess their acceptance of ChatGPT. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants to gain deeper insights into their perspectives on using ChatGPT for writing, a fundamental skill in EFL that demands high levels of linguistic accuracy, organization, and creativity, making it particularly sensitive to the influence of Artificial Intelligence tools like ChatGPT. The results revealed that the participants generally perceived ChatGPT as useful and easy to use, with a positive attitude toward the tool. Despite these favorable perceptions, the behavioral intention to use ChatGPT regularly was markedly lower, with participants expressing concerns about becoming overly reliant on AI. Qualitative data further confirmed that while participants acknowledged the potential of ChatGPT, many felt that further training and experience were necessary to integrate the tool effectively into their teaching practices. Ethical concerns (student over-reliance, which may lead to academic dishonesty) surrounding the over-dependence on AI for academic tasks were also noted. The findings highlight the need for targeted professional development and the careful consideration of ethical implications in integrating AI tools into language teaching, particularly for writing instruction.


Keywords


ChatGPT; EFL pre-service teachers; sequential explanatory mixed-method; writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, D., & Chuah, K.-M. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based tools in research writing: Current trends and future potentials. In P. P. Churi, S. Joshi, M. Elhoseny, & A. Omrane (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in higher education (p. 16). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003184157-9

Al-Sofi, B. B. M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence-powered tools and academic writing: to use or not to use ChatGPT. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 4(3), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-06-2024-0029

Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: teachers and students’ voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51

Balatero, L. M., Jayno, J. R., & Miranda, K. M. (2024). ESL pre-service teachers’ literacy and acceptance of ChatGPT as a generative AI tool for writing: A sequential explanatory study. Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning, 2(3), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v2i3.3365

Barrot, J. S. (2024). ChatGPT as a language learning tool: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 1151–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09711-4

Basgier, C., & Simpson, A. (2020). Trouble and transformation in higher education: Identifying threshold concepts through faculty narratives about teaching writing. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1906–1918. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1598967

Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.858

Belda-Medina, J., & Kokošková, V. (2024). ChatGPT for language learning: assessing teacher candidates’ skills and perceptions using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2435900

Boudouaia, A., Mouas, S., & Kouider, B. (2024). A study on ChatGPT-4 as an innovative approach to enhancing English as a foreign language writing learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 07356331241247465. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241247465

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cai, Q., Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2024). Factors influencing learner attitudes towards ChatGPT-assisted language learning in higher education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(22), 7112–7126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2261725

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Reflections on the MMIRA the future of mixed methods task force report. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816650298

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dehghani, H., & Mashhadi, A. (2024). Exploring Iranian english as a foreign language teachers’ acceptance of ChatGPT in english language teaching: Extending the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19813-19834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12660-9

ElSayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926

French, A. (2020). Academic writing as identity-work in higher education: Forming a ‘professional writing in higher education habitus.’ Studies in Higher Education, 45(8), 1605–1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1572735

Ghafouri, M., Hassaskhah, J., & Mahdavi-Zafarghandi, A. (2024). From virtual assistant to writing mentor: Exploring the impact of a ChatGPT-based writing instruction protocol on EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and learners’ writing skill. Language Teaching Research, 13621688241239764. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241239764

Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Ciullo, S. (2024). Evidence-based recommendations for teaching writing. Education 3-13, 52(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2357893

Hsu, T.-C., Chang, C., & Jen, T.-H. (2024). Artificial intelligence image recognition using self-regulation learning strategies: effects on vocabulary acquisition, learning anxiety, and learning behaviours of English language learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(6), 3060–3078. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2165508

Huang, J., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). Examining the relationship between the L2 motivational self system and technology acceptance model post ChatGPT introduction and utilization. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100302

Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145

Kohnke, L. (2023). L2 learners’ perceptions of a chatbot as a potential independent language learning tool. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 17(1–2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2023.128339

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174

Levine, S., Beck, S. W., Mah, C., Phalen, L., & PIttman, J. (2024). How do students use ChatGPT as a writing support? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 68(5), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1373

Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316

Lubis, A. H. (2024). Potential uses and concerns of ChatGPT in EFL academic writing classrooms: A preliminary portrait. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 21(3), 698-710. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A456305

Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9

Niloy, A. C., Akter, S., Sultana, N., Sultana, J., & Rahman, S. I. U. (2024). Is Chatgpt a menace for creative writing ability? An experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12929

Nugroho, A, Andriyanti, E., Widodo, P., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2024a). Students’ appraisals post-ChatGPT use: Students’ narrative after using ChatGPT for writing. Innovation in Education and Teaching International. 62(2), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2319184

Nugroho, A., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Syamsi, K. (2024b). Critical writing in higher education: A need analysis survey. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 4(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v4i1.9146

Özçelik, N. P., & Ekşi, G. Y. (2024). Cultivating writing skills: the role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8

Pereira, R., Reis, I. W., Ulbricht, V., & Santos, N. dos. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and academic writing: an analysis of the perceptions of researchers in training. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 22(4), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-01-2024-1501

Pham, N. N. H. (2025). The Use of ChatGPT in EFL students as a Learning Assistant in their Writing Skills: A literature review. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25213

Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Rahman, A. N. I., & Ekkayokkaya, M. (2024). The use of contextual teaching and learning approach on students’ analytical exposition writing skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i3.66955

Razali, K. (2015). GAP: an exploring picture of male and female students quantity gap at English Department, Tarbiyah Faculty, UIN Ar-Raniry. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 3(1), 54-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/ej.v3i1.737

Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843

Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Ulla, M. B., Perales, W. F., & Busbus, S. O. (2023). ‘To generate or stop generating response’: Exploring EFL teachers’ perspectives on ChatGPT in English language teaching in Thailand. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2257252

Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, M., Indrawati, I., Rusdin, D., Ivone, F. M., Basthomi, Y., & Zulfahreza, Z. (2024). Revolutionizing EFL writing: unveiling the strategic use of ChatGPT by Indonesian master’s students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2399431. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2399431




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v15i1.79615

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.