Cover Image

Exploring View of Nature of Science and Technology Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers

Devita Marlina Venessa, Hernani Hernani, Heli Siti Halimatul

Abstract


This study aims to explore the views of pre-service chemistry teachers on the nature of science and technology. Pre-service chemistry teachers’ view of nature of science and technology (VNOST) is very important to help their students later in understanding the concepts of science. This research is the initial stage in didactical design research involving 48 pre-service chemistry teachers from Sriwijaya University. The descriptive method is used to explain the results of the analysis of pre-service chemistry teachers’ VNOST. Student views were assessed using the VNOST questionnaire, consisting of 8 questions and guided by the discourse of ionic liquid technology. Data collection uses a survey containing the views of pre-service chemistry teachers on VNOST and where each statement grouped according to three categories, namely "Realistic" (R), "Has Merit" (HM), and Naïve (N). The results showed that in general, students have the view of Has Merit (HM), or the belief that they chose is not entirely correct even though there are parts of statements that are still by the general view of science. The results of this student VNOST exploration are the basis for developing learning designs that are oriented to the realist answers of each question so that learning designs are produced based on aspects of the Nature of Science and Technology.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References


Aikenhead, G. S., Ryan, A. G., & Fleming, R. W. (1989). Views on science-technology-society. Social Science and Humanities Research Council.

Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument:‘Views on Science—Technology—Society’(VOSTS). Science education, 76(5), 477-491.

Ayvaci, H. S., & Ozbek, D. (2019). The Effect of Documentary Films on Preservice Science Teachers' Views of Nature of Science. Journal of Science Learning, 2(3), 97-107.

Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26.

Fernandes, G. W. R., Rodrigues, A. M., & Ferreira, C. A. (2018). Conceptions of the nature of science and technology: a study with children and youths in a non-formal science and technology education setting. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1071-1106.

Gardner, P. L. (1999). The representation of science-technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 329-347.

Herman, B. C. (2013). A convergence of Postman and Vygotsky perspectives regarding contemporary media’s impact on learning and teaching. The nature of technology (pp. 291-328). Brill Sense.

Kusuma, D. C., Mudzakir, A., & Widhiyanti, T. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ VNOST and their conceptions about the context of OLED and related chemistry contents. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 4, p. 042037). IOP Publishing.

Lacey, H. (2012). Reflections on science and technoscience. Scientiae studia, 10(SPE), 103-128.

Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of research in science teaching, 29(4), 331-359.

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.

Lokollo, L., Hernani, H., & Mudzakir, A. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teacher’s view about the nature of science and technology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1157, No. 4, p. 042036). IOP Publishing.

Mansour, N. (2010). Science teachers’ perspectives on science-technology-society (STS) in science education. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 2(2), 123-157.

Mc Ginn, R. E. (1991). Science and technology, and society (No. 303.483 M4599s Ej. 1). Prentice Hall.

Mudzakir, A., Widhiyanti, T., Hernani, Arifin, M., Lestari, A. N., & Jauhariansyah, S. (2017, August). The nature of science and technology for pre-service chemistry teacher: A case of techno-chemistry experiment “From Stannum Metalicum to conductive glass.” In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1868, No. 1, p. 030015). AIP Publishing.

Murcia, K., & Schibeci, R. (1999). Primary student teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International journal of science education, 21(11), 1123-1140.

OECD, P. (2016). Results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education.

Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615.

Rotherham, A., & Willingham, D. (2010). New, but a Worthy Challenge. American Educator, 17-20.

Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. L. (1993). Examination of Preservice and In-service Secondary Science Teachers' Beliefs about Science-Technology-Society Interactions. Science Education, 77(4), 407-31.

Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. J. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the Views on Science‐Technology‐Society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 387-400.

Shwartz, Y., Ben‐Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2005). The importance of involving high‐school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of ‘chemical literacy.’ International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 323-344.

Tairab, H. H. (2001). How do pre-service and in-service science teachers view the nature of science and technology?. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 235-250.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i1.17757

DOI (DOWNLOAD PDF): https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i1.17757.g10615

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.