The Effects of STEAM-Based Activities Gifted Students’ STEAM Attitudes, Cooperative Working Skills and Career Choices
Abstract
STEAM is one of the teaching strategies frequently used in science education in recent years to ensure the development of students of different ages and characteristics. This study aimed to reveal the effect of STEAM-based activities on gifted students' STEAM attitudes, cooperative working skills, and career choices. For this purpose, a single group pre-test post-test design was used. Thirty-seven secondary school fifth-grade students (10-11 years old) diagnosed as gifted participated in the research. STEAM-based activities were applied to the students for ten weeks. STEAM Attitude Scale, Cooperative Learning Process Scale, and an open-ended question form for career choices were used as data collection tools. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for the quantitative data analysis, and thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. At the end of the application, it was observed that the students' attitudes toward STEAM increased; cooperative working skills improved; they turned to STEAM disciplines in their career choices. It is recommended to give STEAM education to gifted students from an early and guide them to shape their careers.
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Adams, C., Chamberlin, S., Gavin, M. K., Schultz, C., Sheffield, L. J., & Subotnik, R. (2008). The STEM promise: Recognizing and developing talent and expanding opportunities for promising students of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58
Allen, M. (2017). The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781483381411
Allina, B. (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1296392
Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6.
Armknecht, M. P. (2015). Case study on the efficacy of an elementary STEAM laboratory school (Doctoral dissertation). Lindenwood University.
Aslan-Tutak, F., Akaygün, S., & Tezsezen, S. (2017). Collaboratively learning to teach STEM: Change in participating pre-service teachers’ awareness of STEM. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(4), 794-816. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2017027115
Azkin, Z. (2019). Steam (fen-teknoloji-mühendislik-sanat-matematik) uygulamalarının öğrencilerin sanata yönelik tutumlarına, steam anlayışlarına ve mesleki ilgilerine etkisinin incelenmesi [Examining the effects of steam (science-technology-engineering-art-mathematics) applications on students' attitudes towards art, their understanding of steam and their professional interests]. (Master's thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü). Karamanoğlu MehmetBey University.
Bay, E., & Çetin, B. (2012). Development of cooperative learning process scale (CLPS). International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(1), 534-545.
Bingolbali, E., Monaghan, J., & Roper, T. (2007). Engineering students’ conceptions of the derivative and some implications for their mathematical education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(6), 763-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701453579
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Bircan, M. A., & Köksal, Ç. (2020). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin STEM tutumlarının ve STEM kariyer ilgilerinin incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 16-32.
Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1-5.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2016). Vocational psychology: Agency, equity, and well-being. Annual review of psychology, 67, 541-565.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı istatistik, araştırma deseni spss uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences statistics, research design spss applications and interpretation]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Ceylan, Ö., Ermiş, G. & Yıldız, G. (2018). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin bilim, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (STEM) eğitimine yönelik tutumları. International Congress On Gifted and Talented Education, November, 1-3, 64-76.
Clark, B. (1997) The integrative education model. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A., Little (Eds.), Sytems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed). USA: Creative Learning Press.
Clark-Carter, D. (1997). Doing quantitative psychological research: from design to report. Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis.
Clynes, T. (2016). How to raise a genius: Lessons from a 45-year study of super-smart children. Nature, 537(7619), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/537152a
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. The University of Iowa, Iowa City: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
Coleman, A. L. (2014). An exploration of the factors that motivate gifted and talented Black males to engage in science, technology, engineering and mathematics in a gifted, residential community. Illinois Math and Science Academy: DigitalCommons@IMSA.
Cook, K., Bush, S., & Cox, R. (2017). Engineering encounters: From STEM to STEAM. Science and Children, 54(6), 86–93.
Corwith, S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2012). Academic planning for gifted students. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 477–493). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.
Çorlu, M. S., & Çallı, E. (2017). STEM kuram ve uygulamaları. İstanbul: Pusula Yayınları.
Davaslıgil, Ü. (2004). Üstün zekalıların eğitiminde yönetimsel önlemler (Ders notu) [Administrative measures in the education of the gifted (Lecture note)]. İstanbul Üniversitesi, özel eğitim bölümü, İstanbul.
Demir, C. G., Önal, N. T., & Önal, N. (2021). Investigation of Middle School Students' Attitudes towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education and Determination of the Predictors. Journal of Science Learning, 4(2), 101-112. Doi: 10.17509/jsl.v4i2.28859
Dixon, C. & Martin, L. (2014). Make to relate: Narratives of, and as, community practice. In Polman, J. L., Kyza, E. A., O’Neill, D. K., Tabak, I., Penuel, W. R., Jurow, A. S., O’Connor, K., Lee, T., & D’Amico, L. (Edt.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014. Boulder, CO (ss. 1591–1592)
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Frankel, J. R., & Wallen N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hill.
Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397
Genç, M. , Ata, A. O. , Ertuğrul, D. , Sakmen, G. , Aktaş, M. , Kalaycı, A. , Sayan, S. , Yağmur, Z. İ. , Tatlı, A. & Yıldız, C. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencileri için STEAM’a yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi [Developing an attitude scale towards STEAM for middle school students]. Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi , 4 (2) , 151-176 . DOI: 10.35346/aod.768364
Gillies, R. M. (2014). Cooperative learning: Developments in research. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2), 125-140.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x
Hallaç, S. (2019). Disiplinlerüstü bir STEAM yaklaşımı ile hazırlanmış öğretim programının öğrencilerin fizik kavramlarını öğrenmelerine, bilime karşı tutumlarına, STEAM tutumlarına ve kariyer seçimlerine etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the effects of the curriculum prepared with a supradisciplinary STEAM approach on students' learning physics concepts, their attitudes towards science, their STEAM attitudes and career choices]. Marmara University Instıtute of Education, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hallinen, J. (2021, November 18). STEM. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/STEM-education
Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active learning in higher education, 14(3), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498035
Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: Implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 416–438. doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
Hew, K.F. & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3):223–252. doi:10. 1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Hu, T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jackson, H. A., Basham, J. D., Thomas, K., & Hunt, C. L. (2020). Designing STEAM Learning Environments. In K. Thomas & D. Huffman (Eds.), Challenges and Opportunities for Transforming From STEM to STEAM Education (pp. 1-23). PA, USA: IGI Global.
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab) use them?. Medical education, 38(12), 1217-1218.
Jin, Y., Chong, L. M. & Cho, H. K. (2012). Designing a robotics-enhanced learning content for STEAM education 2012. 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI) Daejeon, Korea / November 26-29.
Johnson, D.W. (2008). Cooperative Learning. Wiley Online Library.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K., (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8
Kim, H. (2015). The effect of a climate change mMonitoring program on students' knowledge and perceptions of STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1321-1338. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1390a
Kim, M. K., Roh, I. S., & Cho, M. K. (2016). Creativity of gifted students in an integrated math-science instruction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.07.004
Kong, X., Dabney, K. P., & Tai, R. H. (2014). The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2012.760856
Koyunlu Ünlü, Z., & Dökme, İ. (2020). Multivariate assessment of middle school students’ interest in STEM career: A profile from Turkey. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1217-1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9729-4
Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Reports. 35. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35
Lee, J., Seo, Y., Jung, Y., Kang, B., & Lee, M. (2012). A Study on the application of STEAM education for elementary and secondary students in ‘Gifted and talented classes’ and ‘Gifted and talented centers’. Research Report 2012-06. Korean Educational Development Institute.
Lee, S., Baek, J., & Lee, J. (2013). The Development and the Effects of Educational Program applied on STEAM for the Mathematical Prodigy. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 16(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2013.16.1.035
Lent, R. (2013). Social cognitive career theory. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 115–146). Hoboken: Wiley.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and subjective well-being in the context of work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707305769
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social-cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36
Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9628-2.
Leppel, K., Williams, M. L., & Waldauer, C. (2001). The impact of parental occupation and socioeconomic status on choice of college major. Journal of Family and Economic issues, 22(4), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012716828901
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Diez, C. R., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: an exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8
Mahoney, M. P. (2010). Students’ attitudes toward STEM: development of an instrument for high school STEM-based programs. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 24–34.
Mann, E. L., Mann, R. L., Strutz, M. L., Duncan, D., & Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Integrating engineering into K-6 curriculum: Developing talent in the STEM disciplines. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(4), 639-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X11415007
Masnick, A. M., Valenti, S. S., Cox, B. D., & Osman, C. J. (2010). A multidimensional scaling analysis of students’ attitudes about science careers. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902759053
Mau, W. C. J. (2016). Characteristics of US students that pursued a STEM major and factors that predicted their persistence in degree completion. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1495-1500. Doi: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040630
McQuitty, S. (2004). Statistical power and structural equation models in business research. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00301-0
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. sınıflar) [Science course curriculum (Primary and secondary school 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. grades)]. https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim-programlari/icerik/72
Mitchell, P. T. (2016). Undergraduate motivations for choosing a science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) major. Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1907
National Association for Gifted Children. (2009). State of the nation in gifted education: How states regulate and support programs and services for gifted and talented students [An executive summary of the State of the states report]. National Association for Gifted Children, 1-4.
National Research Council (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Neber, H., Finsterwald, M., & Urban, N. (2001) Cooperative Learning with gifted and high-achieving students: A review and meta-analyses of 12 studies. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130120084339
Oh, J., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2013). Development and application of STEAM based education program using scratch: Focus on 6th graders’ science in elementary school. In J. Park, J. Ng, H. Jeong & B. Waluyo (Eds.), Multimedia and ubiquitous engineering, lecture notes in electrical engineering (Vol. 240, pp. 493-501). Dordrecht: Springer.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Özçelik, A., & Akgündüz, D. (2018). Üstün/özel yetenekli öğrencilerle yapılan okul dışı STEM eğitiminin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of out-of-school STEM education with gifted and talented students]. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 334-351.
Özkan, G. (2020). Fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, sanat ve matematik uygulamalarının öğrencilerin kavramsal anlamalarına, meslek algılarına ve yaratıcı düşüncelerine etkisi [The effects of science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics applications on students' conceptual understanding, profession perceptions and creative thoughts]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Yıldız Teknik University.
Park, N., & Ko, Y. (2012, September). Computer education’s teaching-learning methods using educational programming language based on STEAM education. In IFIP international conference on network and parallel computing (pp. 320-327). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Parlakay, E. S. (2017). FeTeMM (STEM) uygulamalarının beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin sorgulayıcı öğrenmelerine, motivasyonlarına ve'canlılar dünyasını gezelim ve tanıyalım'ünitesindeki akademik başarılarına etkisi [The effect of the applications on the inquiry learning, motivation and academic achievement of the fifth grade students in the unit of 'Let's travel and get to know the living world'.]. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hatay.
Parlakay, E. S. (2017). FeTeMM (STEM) uygulamalarının beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin sorgulayıcı öğrenmelerine, motivasyonlarına ve'canlılar dünyasını gezelim ve tanıyalım'ünitesindeki akademik başarılarına etkisi [The effect of STEM (STEM) applications on fifth grade students' inquiry learning, motivation and academic achievement in the unit of 'Let's travel and get to know the living world']. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hatay.
Plonczak, I., & Zwirn, S. G. (2015). Understanding the art in science and the science in art through crosscutting concepts. Science Scope, 38(7), 57-63.
Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3
Pricewaterhouse Coopers Australia (PwC). (2015). A smart move: future-proofing Australia's workforce by growing skills in science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM). http://www.pwc.com.au/pdf/a-smart-move-pwc-stem-report-april-2015.pdf.
Rankin, J. G. (2016). Engaging and challenging gifted students: tips for supporting extraordinary minds in your classroom (ASCD Arias). ASCD.
Rehmat, A. P. (2015). Engineering the Path to Higher-Order Thinking in Elementary Education: A Problem-Based Learning Approach for STEM Integration (Publication No. 1734004410) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and individual differences, 20(4), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012
Robinson, A., Dailey, D., Hughes, G., & Cotabish, A. (2014). The effects of a science-focused STEM intervention on gifted elementary students’ science knowledge and skills. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14533799
Rogers, K. B. (2004). The academic effects of acceleration. A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students, 2, 47-57.
Roman, H. T. (2012). STEM-a powerful approach to real-world problem solving for gifted and talented students in middle and high school grades. Manassas, VA: Gifted Education Press.
Sağat, E., & Karakuş, F. (2020). The Effect of Steam-Based Science Teaching on Steam Performence Design Based Thinking Skills and Steam Attitudes of Gifted and Talented Students. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 5(13), 1279-1329.
Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Stuessy, C. (2015). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of international science olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and twenty-first century skill development. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 785-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9439-5
Sajjadi, S. H., Rejskind, F. G., & Shore, B. M. (2001). Is multipotentiality a problem or not? A new look at the data. High Ability Studies, 12, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130124556
Sampson, J. P., & Chason, A. K. (2008). Helping gifted and talented adolescents and young adults: Make informed and careful career choices. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 327–346). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Sarı, U., Alıcı, M., & Şen, Ö. F. (2018). The effect of STEM instruction on attitude, career perception and career interest in a problem-based learning environment and student opinions. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 22(1), 1-21.
Schroth, S. T., & Helfer, J. A. (2017). Gifted & green: Sustainability/environmental science investigations that promote gifted children’s learning. Gifted Child Today, 40(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516675903
Sheridan, K. M., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B. K., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T . (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u
Shimazoe, J., & Aldrich, H., (2010). Group work can be gratifying: understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning. Collage Teaching. 58, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903418594
Slavin, R.E. (Ed.). (2014). Proven Programs in Education: Science, Technology, and Mathematics (STEM). Corwin Press.
Sloan, P. J. (2020). Increasing gifted women’s pursuit of STEM: Possible role of NYC selective specialized public high schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912026
Smith, K. A. (1995). Cooperative learning: effective teamwork for engineering classrooms. In: Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 2b5. 13-12b15. 18 vol. 11.
Sochacka, N. W., Guyotte, K. W., & Walther, J. (2016). Learning together: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM+the Arts) education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20112
Soria, K. M., & Stebleton, M. J. (2013). Social capital, academic engagement, and sense of belonging among working-class college students. College Student Affairs Journal, 31(2), 139.
Sternberg, R. J. (2019) Teaching and assessing gifted students in STEM disciplines through the augmented theory of successful intelligence. High Ability Studies, 30:1-2, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1528847
Stoeger, H., Duan, X., Schirner, S., Greindl, T., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Computers & Education, 69, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032
Subotnik, R. F. (2006). A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 354-355.
Şahin, E., & Yildirim, B. (2020). Determination of the effects of stem education approach on career choices of gifted and talented students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3), 1-13.
Şahin, F. (2015). Üstün zekâlı öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik eğitsel stratejiler [Educational strategies for the education of gifted students]. Üstün zekâlı ve üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitimi içinde, 1-14.
Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143-1144. Doi: 10.1126/science.1128690
Tennant, M., McMullen, C., & Kaczynski, D. (2009). Teaching, learning and research in higher education: A critical approach. Routledge.
Thompson, K., Chapman, S. N., & Kanasa, H. (2020). Tools to mediate learning and self-assessment in a STEAM unit of work. In Challenges and Opportunities for Transforming from STEM to STEAM Education (pp. 24-50). IGI Global.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915571160
Vasquez, J., Comer, M., & Sneider, C. (2013). STEM Lesson Essentials, Grades 3–8: Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N.P. (2010). Discussion paper: 21st century skills. http://www.kennisnet.nl/uploads/tx_kncontentelements/21st-Century-Skills.pdf
Vu, P., Harshbarger, D., Crow, S., & Henderson, S. (2019). Why STEM? Factors that influence gifted students’ choice of college majors. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 3(2), 63-71.
Watson, A. D., & Watson, G. H. (2013). Transitioning STEM to STEAM: Reformation of engineering education. Journal for Quality and Participation, 36(3), 1-5.
Wieselmann, J. R., Dare, E. A., Roehrig, G., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2019, June). Participation in Small Group Engineering Design Activities at the Middle School Level: An Investigation of Gender Differences. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
Wieselmann, J. R., Roehrig, G. H., & Kim, J. N. (2020). Who succeeds in STEM? Elementary girls' attitudes and beliefs about self and STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 120(5), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12407
Wyss, V. L., Heulskamp, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2012). Increasing middle school student interest in STEM careers with videos of scientists. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 501-522.
Yakman, G. & Hyonyong, L. (2012). Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072- 1086. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
Yu, H. & Jen, E. (2021) The gender role and career self-efficacy of gifted girls in STEM areas. High Ability Studies, 32:1, 71-87, https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1705767
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i3.46215
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Özge Ceylan Konkuş, Ünsal Umdu Topsakal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia