Cover Image

Smartchem: An Android Application for Learning Multiple Representations of Acid-Base Chemistry

Eliyawati Eliyawati, Rika Rafikah Agustin, Yustika Sya’bandari, Rossy Andini Herindra Putri

Abstract


An android application named SmartChem was developed to explain multiple representations of acid-base chemistry. This paper is a description of an android-based media (SmartChem) through the stages of design, development, validation and revision, and finally, limited trials with pre-service science teachers. SmartChem is intended to aid students in understanding through media explanations of symbolic, macroscopic, and submicroscopic representations of acid-base material. The validity of the tool was assessed through the ratings of a panel of five expert judges using Aiken’s validity index (Aiken’s V). The results show that some parts of the SmartChem media needed to be revised, especially in linking submicroscopic level content with symbolism. From the trials of this application with trainee teachers, help in understanding multiple chemical representations of acids and bases was demonstrated; however, the low achievement group was more concerned with technical features, while the higher achieving group appreciated the content and learning experience.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References


Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and psychological measurement, 45(1), 131-142.

Andriani, T. (2016). Sistem Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Sosial Budaya, 12(1), 117-126.

Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of Multimedia-Based Instruction That Emphasizes Molecular Representations on Students’ Understanding of Chemical Change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20005

Cahyani, I., & Nasruddin, H. (2019). The Development Of Students Worksheet Oriented Problem Solving To Train Creative Thinking Skills In Acid Base Matter For 11th Grade. Unesa Journal Of Chemical Education, 8(2).

Calik, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of eighth‐grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638-667.

Dunn, J. G. (1999). Assessing item content-relevance in sport psychology scale-construction research: Issues and recommendations. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3(1), 15-36.

Eliyawati, Rohman, I., & Kadarohman, A. (2018). The effect of learning multimedia on students’ understanding of macroscopic, sub-microscopic, and symbolic levels in electrolyte and nonelectrolyte. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012002

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2011). Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 5-14.

Helsy, I., & Andriyani, L. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Berorientasi Multipel Representasi Kimia. Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 2(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.15575/jta.v2i1.1365

Ibrahim, F., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. The Development of HTML5-based Virtual Chemistry Laboratory (VICH-LAB) Media on Acid-Base Material to Improve High School Students' Self-Efficacy.

Istijabatun, S. (2008). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Alam terhadap Pemahaman Mata Pelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 2(2), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72659-5_2

Kamkhou, P., & Yuenyoung, C. (2019). Magnet and Pin kit: Connection Symbolic and Submicroscopic Representations of Lewis dot structure and Molecular geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012070

Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology Third Edition A Step By Step Guide For Beginner (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kumar, S. (2013). International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE), 4(4), 214.

Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: Innovating classroom education in a Malaysian university. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(2), 99-110.

Liao, Y., Loures, E. R., Venâncio, A., Brezinski, G., & Deschamps, F. (2018). The impact of the fourth industrial revolution: a cross-country/region comparison. Production, 28(0). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20180061

Lin, H. M., Chen, W. J., & Nien, S. F. (2014). The Study of Achievement and Motivation by E-Learning-A Case Study. International Journal of information and education technology, 4(5), 421.

Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52(3), 599-607.

Mewengkang, A., Liando, O. E. S., Ngodu, M. R., Moningkey, E. R. S., & Wantania, T. (2019). Android Based Application for Children Learning with Indonesian and Mongondow Language. 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018). Atlantis Press.

Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38-46.

Rachmadtullah, R., Zulela, Ms., & Sumantri, M. S. (2018). Development of computer-based interactive multimedia: study on learning in elementary education. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 2035-2038.

Raviolo, A. (2001). Assessing Students ’ Conceptual Understanding of Solubility Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 629–631.

Roche Allred, Z. D., & Bretz, S. L. (2019). University chemistry students’ interpretations of multiple representations of the helium atom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8rp00296g

Sunyono, S., & Meristin, A. (2018). The Effect of Multiple Representation-Based Learning (MRL) to Increase Students’ Understanding of Chemical Bonding Concepts. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.16219

Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306

Umachandran, D. K., Jurcic, I., & Ferdinand-James, D. (2018). Gearing up education towards Industry 4.0. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 17(2), 7305–7311. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v17i2.7754

Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students’ use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1033




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i3.23280

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 Eliyawat Eliyawati, Rika Rafikah Agustin, Yustika Sya’bandari, Rossy Andini Herindra Putri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with the Indonesian Society of Science Educators
2020