Cover Image

Enhancing Students’ Scientific Literacy using Virtual Lab Activity with Inquiry-Based Learning

Liandha Arieska Putri, Anna Permanasari, Nanang Winarno, Nur Jahan Ahmad

Abstract


Laboratory activity is closely related and yet is essential in the process of science teaching-learning. The hands-on laboratory experiment is the one normally used in school. Particularly with the state of online schooling, it is quite challenging to perform a hands-on laboratory activity. The combination of inquiry-based learning with virtual lab activity can be an alternative to developing a more alluring yet meaningful learning process within online learning. This research aims to analyze virtual lab activity with inquiry-based learning on students’ scientific literacy in light and optics topics. Participants were taken from junior high school students in the 8th-grade in Bandung, Indonesia. It includes 40 students with 14 males and 26 females with ages range 13-14 years old who have not yet studied light and optics. A pre-experimental research method with a one-group pre- the post-test design was used. The finding indicates that students’ scientific literacy was significantly increased with a medium category (N-Gain score 0.441). Based on this research, virtual-lab activity with inquiry-based learning could be considered an alternative to conducting a meaningful online learning activity, especially in science education.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References


Afriani, T., & Agustin, R. R. (2019). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Laboratory Activity with Video Embedded on Students' Understanding and Motivation in Learning Light and Optics. Journal of Science Learning, 2(4), 79-84.

Agasisti, T., & Zoido, P. (2018). Comparing the efficiency of schools through international benchmarking: Results from an empirical analysis of OECD PISA 2012 data. Educational Researcher, 47(6), 352-362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18777495

Beck, C., Butler, A., & Burke da Silva, K. (2014). Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: are we meeting the grade?. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0245

Blumer, L. S., & Beck, C. W. (2019). Laboratory courses with guided-inquiry modules improve scientific reasoning and experimental design skills for the least-prepared undergraduate students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(1), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0152

Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Chao, J. (2015). The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties. Computers & Education, 85, 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.007

Cresswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. United States of America, Pearson.

Daineko, Y., Dmitriyev, V., & Ipalakova, M. (2017). Using virtual laboratories in teaching natural sciences: An example of physics courses in university. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21777

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). Internal validity. How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 166-83.

Galan, D., Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Dormido, S., & Esquembre, F. (2017). The experiment editor: supporting inquiry-based learning with virtual labs. European Journal of Physics, 38(3), 035702.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for intriductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2013). Fundamentals of physics. John Wiley & Sons.

Hermansyah, H., Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Adawiyah, R. (2019). Guided inquiry model with virtual labs to improve students’ understanding on heat concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153(1), 012116. IOP Publishing.

Hurd, P. D. (2000). Science education for the 21st century. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17321.x

Ifthinan, D. N. M., & Atun, A. (2019). Virtual laboratory based on inquiry in chemical equilibrium as learning innovations. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 10(1), 8-18.

Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., & Setiawan, W. (2016). Stem virtual lab: an alternative practical media to enhance student's scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239-246. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.5492

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2004). Models of teaching (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Kroothkaew, S., & Srisawasdi, N. (2013). Teaching how light can be refracted using simulation-based inquiry with a dual-situated learning model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2023-2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.159

Lee, M. C., & Sulaiman, F. (2018). The Effectiveness of Practical Work on Students’ Motivation and Understanding towards Learning Physics. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 7(8), 2319-7714

Lenses and mirrors. (n.d.). Simbucket. https://simbucket.com/lensesandmirrors/

NRC (National Research Council). (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.

OECD.(2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing

OECD.(2018). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309-327.

Prima, E., Putri, A. R., & Rustaman, N. (2018). Learning Solar System Using PhET Simulation to Improve Students' Understanding and Motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 60-70.

Ray Optics Simulation. (n.d.). RickTu288. https://ricktu288.github.io/ray-optics/simulator/

Tural, G. (2015). Cross-Grade Comparison of Students' Conceptual Understanding with Lenses in Geometric Optics. Science Education International, 26(3), 325-343.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253

Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science education students' chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395

Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry pedagogy on students’ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043

Wardani, T. B., & Winarno, N. (2017). Using Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities in Lights and Optics Topic to Improve Students' Understanding about Nature of Science (NOS). Journal of Science Learning, 1(1), 28-35.

Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in science education, 38(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y

Zhang, L. (2016). Is inquiry-based science teaching worth the effort?. Science & Education, 25(7-8), 897-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9856-0




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.27561

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Liandha Arieska Putri, Anna Permanasari, Nanang Winarno, Nur Jahan Ahmad

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with the Indonesian Society of Science Educators
2021