Analogies Used in a General Biology Course

Analogies Used in a General Biology Course: How is DNA Conserved Across Generations?

Nazlı Rüya Taşkın Bedizel, Nursen Azizoğlu

Abstract


The present study has two main goals. First, it aims to examine the analogies an instructor uses about "DNA conservation across generations" in a university-level General Biology course. Second, it aims to examine the analogies used in those lessons according to Thiele and Treagust's framework. A qualitative case study design is adopted in the present study to investigate the cases in depth. Data were collected from an instructor with 35 years of teaching and research experience during a general biology course. According to the results, the instructor used many analogies, but seven of them were about to explain DNA conservation across generations. These analogies were analyzed by quoting the instructor and using figures and the classification mentioned above framework. It was noted that most of the analogies used by the instructor about DNA are structural-functional, verbal-pictorial, concrete, enriched, and embedded activators. For students to learn abstract concepts such as DNA correctly, this study provides examples of analogies that have been tried with well-established similarity relationships between source and target that engage students in the lesson. The effectiveness of the analogies on students' achievement and problem-solving skills can be tested in future studies.

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Akaygun, S., Brown, C., Karatas, F. O., Supasorn, S., & Yaseen, Z. (2018). Teaching chemistry with analogies around the world: views of teachers from four countries. In International Perspectives on Chemistry Education Research and Practice (pp. 129-146). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2018-1293.ch009

Akgül, G. D. & Çolak, N. (2022). DNA, gen ve kromozom kavramları için geliştirilen hikaye tarzındaki analojilerin değerlendirilmesi. Sinerji Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.54971/synergy.1109208

Azizoğlu, N., Aslan, S., & Pekcan, S. (2015). The periodic system and teaching with analogies model: the effects of teaching method, gender, and motivation on students' achievement. Elementary Education Online, 14(2), 472-488. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.39450

Azizoğlu, N., Çamurcu, M., & Kırtak Ad, V. N. (2014). Identifying and classifying analogies used in the secondary physics textbooks. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(2), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10108a

Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655648

Baker, W. P., & Lawson, A. E. (2001). Complex instructional analogies and theoretical concept acquisition in college genetics. Science Education, 85(6), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1031

Baldauf, S. L. (2003). The deep roots of eukaryotes. Science, 300, 1703-1706. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1085544

Bean T. W., Searles, D., Singer, H., & Cowen S. (1990). Learning concepts from biology text through pictorial analogies and an analogical study guide. Journal of Educational Research, 83(4), 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885961

Begolli, K. N., & Richland, L. E. (2016). Teaching mathematics by comparison: Analog visibility as a double-edged sword. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000056

Berber, N. C., & Sari, M. (2009). Effectiveness of Pedagogical Analogical Models on Realization of Conceptual Change for Teaching Work Power Energy Concepts. Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 29(1), 257-277. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gefad/issue/6745/90697

Bilgin, İ. & Geban, Ö. (2001). The use of analogy to remove 10th grade students' misconceptions related to chemical equilibrium concepts. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 20, 26-32.

Blake, A. (2004). Helping young children to see what is relevant and why: supporting cognitive change in earth science using analogy. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1855-1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000266173

Blečić, M. (2022). The notion of ‘information’ in genetics: a pragmatic model. Journal of Biological Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2020876

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braasch, J. L. G., & Goldman, S. R. (2010). The role of prior knowledge in learning from analogies in science texts, Discourse Processes, 47(6), 447-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903420960

Brown, D. E. (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: a concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1273-1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301009

Brunner, G., Schoenlank, J., Williams, M., &Wiss, T. (1999). Ridgewood analogies: critical and creative thinking across the curriculum, book 5. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

Çalık, M., & Ayas, A (2005). A cross- age study on the understanding of chemical solution and their components. International Education Journal, 6(1), 30-41. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854953.pdf

Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2008). Biyoloji (E. Gündüz, A. Demirsoy, & İ. Türkan, Trans.). Ankara, Türkiye: Palme Yayınları.

Celik, H., Kirindi, T., & Kotaman, Y. A. (2020). The effect of the computer-based analogy used in science teaching on learning outcomes. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 73-93.. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.14

Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Cognitive understanding levels. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; Oxford University Press.

Chu, Y.-C., & Reid, N. (2012). Genetics at school level: addressing the difficulties. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.732059

Çoban, M. H. (2019). The effect of analogy-based 5e learning model on the academic success of students with different learning styles in the teaching of the electrical energy unit (Master’s thesis). Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Turkey.

Corn, J., Pittendrigh, B. R., & Orvis, K. S. (2004). Genomics analogy model for educators (GAME): From jumping genes to alternative splicing. Journal of Biological Education, 39(1), 24-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655950

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dagher, Z. R. (1995). Analysis of analogies used by science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320306

De Jong, O., Veal, W. R., & Van Driel, J. H. (2002). Exploring chemistry teachers' knowledge base. In J. K. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: towards research-based practice (pp. 369–390). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47977-X_16

DeBruyn, J. M. (2012). Teaching the central dogma of molecular biology using jewelry. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 13(1), 62-64. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.356.

Demirci-Güler P., & Yağbasan, R. (2008). The description of problems relating to analogies used in science and technology textbooks. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(16), 105-122. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/inuefd/issue/8707/108707

Djudin, T., & Grapragasem, S. (2019). The use of pictorial analogy to increase students achievement and its retention of physics lessons of direct current. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya [Journal of Physics Research and Its Application], 9(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n2.p140-151

Doğan, S., Kırvak, E., & Baran, Ş. (2004). The levels of secondary school students making connection between daily life and the knowledge gained during biology lectures. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 6(1), 57- 63. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erziefd/issue/5993/79746

Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501

Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75, 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606

Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th–10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655– 674. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20312

Else, M. J., Clement, J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2008). Using analogies in science teaching and curriculum design: Some guidelines. In Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 215-231). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6494-4_12

Faltýnek, D., Matlach, V., & Lacková, Ľ. (2019). Bases are not letters: On the analogy between the genetic code and natural language by sequence analysis. Biosemiotics, 12, 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-019-09353-z

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155- 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3

Gentner, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Reasoning and learning analogy. American Psychologist, 52(1), 32-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.32

Gilbert, S. W. (1989). An evaluation of the use of analogy, simile, and metaphor in science texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660260405

Glynn, S. M. (1989). The teaching with analogies (TWA) model: Explaining concepts in expository text: In K.D. Muth (Ed.), Children's Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Text: Research into Practice. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explaining Science Concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. S. In Glynn, R.Yeany, & B. Britton (Ed.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Glynn, S. M. (2008). Making science concepts meaningful to students: Teaching with analogies. In S. Mikelskis-Seifert, U. Ringelband, & M. Brückmann (Eds.), Four decades of research in science education: From curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 113-125). Münster: Waxmann.

Glynn, S. M., & Takahashi, T. (1998). Learning from analogy- enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1129-1149. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199812)35:10<1129::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-2

Glynn, S. M., Duit, R., & Thiele, R. B. (1995). Teaching science with analogies: A strategy for constructing knowledge. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 247-273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gray, M. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2021). Teaching by analogy: from theory to practice. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15, 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12288

Green, A. E. (2016). Creativity, within reason: Semantic distance and dynamic state creativity in relational thinking and reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415618485

Green, A. E., Spiegel, K. A., Giangrande, E. J., Weinberger, A. B., Gallagher, N. M., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2017). Thinking cap plus thinking zap: TDCS of frontopolar cortex improves creative analogical reasoning and facilitates conscious augmentation of state creativity in verb generation. Cerebral Cortex, 27(4), 2628–2639. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw080

Guerra- Ramos, M. T. (2011). Analogies as tools for meaning making in elementary science education: How do they work in classroom settings? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(1), 29- 39. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75175

Güneş, M. H., & Güneş, T. (2005). Difficulties and their reasons in learning biology concepts in primary school students. Gazi University Journal of Kırsehir Education Faculty, 6(2), 169-175. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/59538/856372

Han, M., & Kim, Hb. (2019). Elementary students' modeling using analogy models to reveal the hidden mechanism of the human respiratory system. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 923–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9895-x

Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2018). Students’ conception of genetic phenomena and its effect on their ability to understand the underlying mechanism. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(36), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-01-0014

Hesman Saey, T. (2018). Your DNA is an open book — but can’t yet be fully read: the stories your genes can tell are currently full of blank pages. Science News for Students. https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/your-dna-open-book-cant-yet-be-fully-read

Heywood, D. & Parker, J. (1997): Confronting the analogy: primary teachers exploring the usefulness of analogies in the teaching and learning of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 869-885. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190801

Heywood, D. (2002). The place of analogies in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147577

Hutchison, C. B. & Padgett, B. L. (2007). How to create and use analogies effectively in the teaching of science concepts. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 44(2), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.44.2.69-72

Jee, B. D., Uttal, D. H., Gentner, D., Manduca, C., Shipley, T. F., & Sageman, B. (2013). Finding faults: Analogical comparison supports spatial concept learning in geoscience. Cognitive Processing, 14(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0551-7

Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Banjoko, A. (2013). Assessing the effects of prior conceptions on learning gene expression. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(4), 82-91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43631926

Johann, L. I., Rusk, F. K. H., Reiss, M. J., & Groß, J. (2022). Upper secondary students' thinking pathways in cell membrane biology – an evidence-based development and evaluation of learning activities using the Model of Educational Reconstruction. Journal of Biological Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2026805

Kaya, E., & Gürbüz, H. (2002). The views of the high schools and vocational high schools students on the problems of biology teaching. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 4(2), 11-21. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/erziefd/issue/5990/79724

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824283

Kete, R., Horasan, Y., & Namdar, B. (2012). Investigation of the conceptual understanding difficulties in 9th grade biology books about cell unit. Elementary Education Online, 11(1), 95-106. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/8590/106761

Kumar, P., Manik, R. K., & Joshi, A. (2023). DNA is a blue print of life: a yoga-based review. European Chemical Bulletin, 12(Special Issue 1), 1088-1095.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Lancor, R. A. (2014). Using student-generated analogies to investigate conceptions of energy: a multidisciplinary study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.714512

Lee, W., & Kim, H. (2007). Gifted middle students' conceptual change of an enzyme by using systemic analogies during the interpretation of experimental results. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(3), 212–224. https://koreascience.kr/journal/GHGOBX/v27n3.page

Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, R. C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division, and inheritance: Do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949

Marcelos, M. F., & Nagem, R. L. (2012). Use of the "Tree" analogy in evolution teaching by biology teachers. Science & Education, 21, 507–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9370-3

McHughen A. (2020). DNA demystified: unravelling the double helix. Oxford University Press.

Mozzer, N. B., & Justi, R (2012). Students' pre- and post-teaching analogical reasoning when they draw their analogies. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 429-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.593202

Mthethwa-Kunene, E., Onwu, G. O., & de Villiers, R. (2015). Exploring biology teachers' pedagogical content knowledge in the teaching of genetics in Swaziland science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1140-1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1022624

Newton, L. D. (2003). The occurrence of analogies in elementary school science books. Instructional Science, 31, 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025706410666

Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory‐guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026

Orgill, M., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). An analysis of the effectiveness of analogy use in college-level biochemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1040 1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20129

Parsons, J. D., & Davies, J. (2022). The neural correlates of analogy component processes. Cognitive Science, 46(3), p. e13116. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13116

Paul, A., Lim, A., Salleh, S. M., & Shahrill, M. (2019). Enhanced learning through analogy in the teaching of cardiovascular system. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10273a

Pekdağ, B., & Azizoğlu, N. (2013). Semantic mistakes and didactic difficulties in teaching the "amount of substance" concept: A useful model. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(1), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20132A

Rice, S., & McArthur, J. (2002). Computer analogies: teaching molecular biology and ecology.Journal of College Science Teaching, 32(3), 176-181. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42991498

Rothhaar, R., Pittendrigh, B. R., & Orvis, K. (2006). The genomics analogy model for educators (GAME): The effectiveness of the Lego® model for teaching gene sequencing and biotechnology in high school classrooms. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656039

Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Scaiewicz, A.& Levitt, M. (2015). The language of the protein universe. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 35, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.08.010.

Shana, Z. A., & El Shareef, M. A. (2022). Science teachers' use of analogies: Findings from classroom practices. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1023-1036. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1023

Shulman, L.S. (1986) Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Spiro, R., Feltovich, P., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-528). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.023

Suryanda, A., Azrai, E. P., Nuramadhan, M., & Ichsan, I. Z. (2020). Analogy and critical thinking skills: Implementation learning strategy in biodiversity and environment topic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4A), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081807

Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1991). Using analogies to aid understanding in secondary chemistry education (ED349164). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED349164.pdf

Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1994). The nature and extent of analogies in secondary chemistry textbooks. Instructional Science, 22, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889523

Todd, A., & Kenyon, L. (2015). Empirical refinements of a molecular genetics learning progression: The molecular constructs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1385–1418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21262

Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Joslin, P., & Lindauer, I. (1992). Science teachers' use of analogies: Observations from classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140404

Treagust, D. F., Harrison A. G & Venville, G. J. (1998). Teaching science effectively with analogies: an approach for preservice and inservice teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(2), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009423030880

Trujillo, C. M., Anderson, T. R., & Pelaez, N. J. (2016). Exploring the MACH model's potential as a metacognitive tool to help undergraduate students monitor their explanations of biological mechanisms. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-03-0051

Tunner, P. C., Mclennan, A. G., Bates, A. D., White, M. R. H., & Konuk, M. (2004). Ökaryotik kromozom yapısı [Eucaryotic chromosome structure]. In M. Konuk (Ed.), S. Cenkci, M. Yıldız, A. Aktümsek, Moleküler biyoloji önemli notlar [Molecular Biology]. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Venville, G. J., & Donovan, J. (2006). Analogies for life: a subjective view of analogies and metaphors used to teach genes and DNA. Teaching Science, 52(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.152547

Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). Analogies in biology Education: a contentious issue. The American Biology Teacher, 59(5), 282-287. doi.org/10.2307/4450309

Vosniadou, S. (2014). Examining cognitive development from a conceptual change point of view: the framework theory approach. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.921153

Woody, S. & Himelblau, E. (2013). Understanding & teaching genetics using analogies. The American Biology Teacher, 75(9), 664-669. doi.org/10.1525/abt.2013.75.9.7

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (5.bs) [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences, 5th ed.]. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yılmaz, Y., & Yalın, H. (2019). The effect of analogies positioning differently on academic success and persistency in online learning process. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 17(2), 443-462. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tebd/issue/50950/647450

Zorluoğlu, S. L., & Sözbilir, M. (2016). The effect of analogy technique applied to ionic and covalent bonds on student success. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 11(1), 84-99. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/befdergi/issue/23129/247048




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i4.57909

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Nazlı Rüya Taşkın Bedizel, Nursen Azizoğlu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Science Learning is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with the Indonesian Society of Science Educators
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia
Website: http://www.upi.edu
Email: jslearning@upi.edu
View My Stats