Cover Image

The Effect of Documentary Films on Preservice Science Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science

Hakan Şevki Ayvacı, Dilek Özbek

Abstract


Understanding the nature of science, one of the most important dimensions of scientific literacy, is regarded as an absolute necessity in science education. To teach students the nature of science, science teachers should emphasize the nature of science in the classrooms. This is possible through the training of science teachers with knowledge of the nature of science. In this study, documentary films were used to teach preservice science teachers about the nature of science. This study aims to investigate the effect of nature of science course conducted with documentary films on preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science. The study, in which the experimental design was used, was conducted with 30 preservice teachers in nature of science and history of science courses. Throughout the courses, documentary films were watched, and nature of science aspects of the documentary films was discussed. The Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS-C) was used as pre-test and post-test, and the data were analyzed with SPSS. As a conclusion, preservice science teachers’ views regarding the nature of science were enhanced after the implementation.


Full Text:

Download PDF

References


American Association for The Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ayar, M.C. (2007). Fen-Teknoloji-toplum dersinin fen bilgisi öğretmeni adaylarının bilimin doğasına ilişkin görüşlerine etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

Bell, R.L., Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563–581.

Bloom, M., Binns, I. C., & Koehler, C. (2015). Multifaceted NOS instruction: contextualizing nature of science with documentary films. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(3), 405-428.

Buaraphan, K. (2010). Prospective and in-service science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science, Science Educator, 19(2), 35-47.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Pegem A Yayıncılık.

Çil, E. (2010). Bilimin Doğasının Kavramsal Değişim Pedagojisi ve Doğrudan Yansıtıcı Yaklaşım İle Öğretilmesi: Işık Ünitesi Örneği Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.

Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Deng, F., Chen, D. T., Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. S. (2011). Students' views of the nature of science: A critical review of research. Science Education, 95(6), 961-999.

Dereli, F. (2016). Sınıf dünya ve evren konu alanına uyarlanmış bilimin doğası kazanımlarının akıllı tahta etkinlikleri ile öğretimi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Burdur.

Efthimiou, C. J., & Llewellyn, R. A. (2007). Cinema, Fermi problems and general education. Physics education, 42(3), 253.

Göksu, V., Aslan, O., Murat, Ö., & Zor, T. Ş. (2016). Açık-düşündürücü ve tarih temelli öğretimin fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğası anlayışları üzerindeki etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(34), 313-327.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education Limited.

Higher Education Council (HEC) (2018). Science Teaching Undergraduate Program. Ankara

Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395-418.

Laçin-Simsek, C. (2019). What can stories on history of science give to students? thoughts of science teachers candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 99-112.

Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of research in science teaching, 29(4), 331-359.

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, Present, And Future. In Abell, S. K. and Lederman, N. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831- 879). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students' perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225-239.

Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.

Mccomas, W. F. (1998). McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In The nature of science in science education (pp. 53-70). Springer, Dordrecht.

Meichtry, Y.J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: data from a case of curriculum development, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 89-407.

Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. (2th Edition), America: Person Education.

Mulvey, B. K., Chiu, J. L., Ghosh, R. & Bell, R. L. (2017). Making learning last: teachers’ long-term retention of improved nature of science conceptions and instructional rationales. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 62-85

National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards, Washington, Dc. National Academic Press.

Prima, E. C., Utari, S., Chandra, D. T., Hasanah, L., & Rusdiana, D. (2018). Heat and temperature experiment designs to support students’ conception on nature of science. JOTSE: Journal of technology and science education, 8(4), 453-472.

Seckin-Kapucu, M., Cakmakci, G., & Aydoğdu, C. (2015). The Influence of Documentary Films on 8th Grade Students' Views about Nature of Science. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 797-808.

Sorensen, P., Newton, L., & McCarthy, S. (2012). Developing a science teacher education course that supports student teachers’ thinking and teaching about the nature of science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(1), 29-47.

Sterling, D. R. (2009). From Aristotle to today: Making the history and nature of science relevant. Science Scope, 32(5), 30.

Taşar, M. F. (2003). Teaching history and the nature of science in science teacher education programs. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 1(13), 30-42.

Vanderlinden, D. W. (2007). Teaching the content and context of science: The effect of using historical narratives to teach the nature of science and science content in an undergraduate introductory geology course. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

Wardani, T. B., & Winarno, N. (2017). Using inquiry-based laboratory activities in lights and optics topic to improve students' understanding about nature of science (NOS). Journal of Science Learning, 1(1), 28-35.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i3.17998

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Hakan Şevki Ayvacı, Dilek Özbek

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Science Learning is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with the Indonesian Society of Science Educators
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia
Website: http://www.upi.edu
Email: js
learning@upi.edu