Cover Image

Opinions of Secondary School Students on the Use of Mobile Augmented Reality Technology in Science Teaching

Gonca Keçeci, Pelin Yıldırım, Fikriye Kırbağ Zengin


Mobile augmented reality (MAR) draws attention in terms of providing a flexible learning process and environment. It is thought that learning environments can be more effective using MAR technology. The research aimed to determine the secondary school students' views on the use of MAR technology in science teaching. The research was conducted with 143 students studying in the sixth grade at two different secondary schools in Turkey. In the research, convergent parallel patterns from mixed-method patterns were used. For eight weeks, the research was carried out to cover the systems unit in our body, situated in the 6th-grade science course curriculum. During the process, the Anatomy 4D application was used in the experimental group during the procedure, and the science course curriculum was used in the control group.  In this paper, a part of the mixed research, the qualitative data collected from the experimental group's semi-structured interview form and diaries were analyzed. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze the data. As a result of the research, although the students do not have a clear idea about AR and MAR technologies at the beginning of the application, it is observed that their thoughts change over time, and MAR applications are effective on the success of the course.

Full Text:



Abd Majid, N. A., Mohammed, H., & Sulaiman, R. (2015). Students’ perception of mobile augmented reality applications in learning computer organization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 111-116.

Ardito, C., & Lanzilotti, R. (2008). “Isn’t this archaeological site exciting!”: A mobile system enhancing school trips. In AVI’08 Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 488–489). Napoli: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1385569.1385670

Arvanitis, T. N., Petrou, A., Knight, J. F., Savas, S., Sotiriou, S., Gargalakos, M., & Gialouri, E. (2009). Human factors and qualitative pedagogical evaluation of a mobile augmented reality system for science education used by learners with physical disabilities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13, 243–250. doi: 10.1007/s00779-007-0187-7

Ay, B. (2018). User profile of the 21st century: Y - Z and Alpha belt. III. International Information and Document Management Department Student Congress, Ankara.

Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed-methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12008

Cepni, S. (2014). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş (7. baskı) [Introduction to research and project work]. Trabzon: Celepler Printing.

Chang, H. Y., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Students’ development of socio-scientific reasoning in a mobile augmented reality learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1410-1431. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1480075

Chang, H. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socio-scientific issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E95-E99.

Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 449–462. doi: 10.1007/s10956012-9405-9

Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2015). Mixed method research: Design and execution (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir, Eds.). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, B. M., & Kloos, D. C. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002

Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7–22. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1

Ecevit, T., & Kaptan, F. (2019). Describing an argumentation aiming research questioning model for 21st century skills. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 36(2), 470-488.

Efstathiou, I., Kyza, E. A., & Georgiou, Y. (2018). An inquiry-based augmented reality mobile learning approach to fostering primary school students’ historical reasoning in non-formal settings. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 22-41. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1276076

Eursch, A. (2007). Increased safety for manual tasks in the field of nuclear science using the technology of augmented reality. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 3:2053–2059.

Fleck, S., & Simon, G. (2013). An augmented reality environment for astronomy learning in elementary grades: An exploratory study. 25. Conference Francophone Sur Interaction Homme-Machine, Bordeaux, France. doi: 10.1145/2534903.2534907

Heinecke, W. F., Milman, N. B., Washington, L. A., & Blasi, L. (2002). New directions in the evaluation of the effectiveness of educational technology. Computers in the Schools, 18(2-3), 97-110. doi: 10.1300/J025v18n02_07

Icten, T., & Güngör, B. A. L. (2017). Examining the latest developments and applications on augmented reality. Gazi University Journal of Science Part C: Design and Technology, 5(2), 111-136.

Ifenthaler, D., & Eseryel, D. (2013). Facilitating complex learning by mobile augmented reality learning environments. In Reshaping Learning: Frontiers of Learning Technologies in a Global Context, 415-438. Springer, Berlin, Germany. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32301-0_18

Jamali, S. S., Shiratuddin, M. F., Wong, K. W., & Oskam, C. L. (2015). Utilising mobile-augmented reality for learning human anatomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 659-668.

Keles, E., Oksüz, B. D., & Bahcekapili, T. (2013). Teachers' views on the use of technology in education: Example of Fatih project. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2).

Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real’’: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Real, 10(3–4), 136–174. doi: 10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4i:

Kozma, R., & Anderson, R. (2002). Qualitative case studies of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 387-394. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00250.doc.x

Kücük, S. (2015). Effects of learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality on medical students' academic achievement, cognitive load, and views toward implementation (PhD dissertation). Ataturk University, Turkey.

McMahon, D., Cihak, D. F., & Wright, R. (2015). Augmented reality as a navigation tool to employment opportunities for postsecondary education students with intellectual disabilities and autism. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 157-172. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2015.1047698

Papagiannakis, G., Schertenleib, S., O’Kennedy, B., Arevalo-Poizat, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Stoddart, A., & Thalmann, D. (2005). Mixing virtual and real scenes in the site of ancient Pompeii. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 16(1), 11–24. doi: 10.1002/cav.53

Rosenbaum, E., Klopfer, E., & Perry, J. (2007). On location learning: Authentic applied science with networked augmented realities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 31-45. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9036-0

Sentürk, M. (2018). The investigation with Solomon four-group design on the effect of using mobile augmented reality (AR) applications in the unit titled solar system and beyond in the seventh-grade on the students' academic success, motivation, science and technology attitude (Master’s Thesis). Kocaeli University, Turkey.

Sirakaya, M. (2015). Effects of augmented reality applications on students' achievement, misconceptions and course engagement (PhD dissertation). Gazi University, Turkey.

Somyürek, S. (2014). Attracting the attention of generation Z in the teaching process: Augmented reality. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 4(1), 63-80.

Squire, K. D., & Jan, M. (2007). Mad city mystery: Developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9037-z

Turan, Z., Meral, E., & Sahin, I. F. (2018). The impact of mobile augmented reality in geography education: achievements, cognitive loads and views of university students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(3), 427-441. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2018.1455174

Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5- 23. doi: 10.1007/BF02504682

Watson, D. M. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 251-266. doi: 10.1023/A:1012976702296

Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seckin Publishing.

Yilmaz, R. M. (2014). Effects of three dimensional storytelling developed with augmented reality technology on narrative skill and creativity (PhD dissertation). Ataturk University, Turkey.

Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178–188.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Gonca Keçeci, Pelin Yıldırım, Fikriye Kırbağ Zengin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Science Learning is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with the Indonesian Society of Science Educators
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia
Email: js