The Impact of STEM-based laboratory activities on pre-service science teachers’ competence perceptions in 21st-Century Skills and STEM Awareness
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the impact of laboratory activities prepared based on STEM-based learning on the competence perceptions in 21st-century skills (learning and innovation skills, life and career, information, media, and technology skills) and STEM awareness. The sample group consisted of 53 pre-service science teachers studying in year 2 of a public university. A quasi-experimental design formed the basis of this experimental study conducted as a quantitative research model. Pre-service teachers were randomly assigned, one to the experimental group (n=28) and the other to the control group (n=25). The experimental group was presented with laboratory activities based on STEM-based learning. In contrast, the control group had only laboratory activities (i.e., a group of students who did not conduct STEM-based laboratory activities). The measurement tools were the 21st Century Skills Competence Perception Scale (21st Century SCS) and the STEM Awareness Scale (SAS). All participants in the study expressed their agreement generally on the level of “I agree” for all three dimensions of the 21st Century SCS regarding STEM. As a result of the implementation, the SCS sub-dimension of “information, media and technology skills” and SAS skills of the experimental group students were higher than those of the students in the control group. It was found that the experimental group used the media and technology effectively and to use technology to access, analyze and share information. It was also thought that the individuals' problem-solving, critical, and high-level thinking skills developed more than the control group, thanks to the higher STEM awareness in the experimental group. Finally, some implications were proposed based on the research results from the STEM-based learning laboratory activities.
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21036
Adams, A. E., Miller, B. G., Saul, M., & Pegg, J. (2014). Supporting elementary pre-service teachers to teach STEM through place-based teaching and learning experiences. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 18(5), 1-22. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/12958
Anagün, Ş., Atalay, N., Kilic, Z., & Yasar, S. (2016). The development of a 21st century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: Validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.9779/puje768
Arslan, A. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayar destekli eğitim yapmaya yönelik tutumları ile özyeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişki. Eletronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(24), 101-109. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6138/82343
Aslan-Tutak, F., Akaygün, S., & Tezsezen, S. (2017). İşbirlikli FeTeMM (Fen, Teknoloji, Mühendislik, Matematik) eğitimi uygulaması: Kimya ve matematik öğretmen adaylarının FeTeMM farkındalıklarının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(4), 794-816. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017027115
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Batty, L., & Reilly, K. (2022) Understanding barriers to participation within undergraduate STEM laboratories: towards development of an inclusive curriculum, Journal of Biological Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2012227
Baysal, R. (2019). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının STEM farkındalıklarının araştırılması. (Yüksek Lisans tezi). Mersin Üniversitesi, Mersin.
Bender, W. N. (2017). 20 Strategies for STEM instruction. Florida: Learning Science International.
Bozkurt, F. (2020). 21. yüzyıl becerileri açısından sosyal bilgiler öğretmenliği lisans programının değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 51, 34-64. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.688622
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Brunsell, E. (2012). Integrating engineering and science in your classroom. NSTA press.
Bulut-Atalar, F. (2021). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının STEM farkındalık ve tutumlarının arttırılmasına yönelik bir eğitim uygulamasının değerlendirilmesi. (Doktora Tezi). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun.
Buyruk, B., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2016). FeTeMM farkındalık ölçeği (FFÖ): Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Part B: Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(2), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10179a
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and engineering teacher, 70(1), 30-35. https://www.proquest.com/openview/75bbe8b13bf3f54ebd755333ffd8621e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=34845
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA press.
Çakır, A., & Güngör, M. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ evaluations of practices in teaching english to young learners in terms of 21st century teacher qualifications. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 244-259. https://www.acarindex.com/pdfler/acarindex-3afc70ac-1475.pdf
Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Barraso, L. R., & Morgan J. R. (2016). Through biodiversity and multiplicative principles Turkish students transform the culture of STEM education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.26478
Çavaş, B., Bulut, Ç., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2013). Fen eğitimine mühendislik odaklı bir yaklaşım: ENGINEER projesi ve uygulamaları [An engineering-focused approach to science education: ENGINEER projects and applications], Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 1(1), 12–22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/fbod/issue/71994/1158020
Çetin, M., Şatıroğlu, G., & Yanık, S. (2018). İlkokul fen bilimleri 4.sınıf ders kitabı. ATA Yayıncılık.
Çevik, M. (2017). A study of STEM Awareness Scale development for high school teachers. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2436-2452.
Cunningham, C. M. (2017). Engineering in elementary STEM education: Curriculum design, instruction, learning, and assessment. Teachers College Press.
Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101(3), 486-505. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21271
Daugherty, J. L. (2012). Infusing engineering concepts: Teaching engineering design. Paper 170. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/170
Dedetürk, A. (2018). 6. sınıf ses konusunda FeTeMM yaklaşımı ile öğretim etkinliklerinin geliştirilmesi, uygulanması ve başarıya etkisinin araştırılması. (Yüksek Lisans tezi). Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri.
Dejarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/prin/ed/2012/00000133/00000001/art00008
Deming, D. J., & Noray, K. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965-2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa021
Dugger, W. E. (2010, December). Evolution of STEM in the United States. In 6th biennial international conference on technology education research (Vol. 10). Queensland.
Duygu, E. (2018) Simülasyon tabanlı sorgulayıcı öğrenme ortamında FETEMM eğitiminin bilimsel süreç becerileri ve FETEMM farkındalıklarına etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans tezi). Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Kırıkkale.
Eddy, S. L., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020106
Erten, P. (2019). Opinions of preservice information technologies teachers on virtual classroom and implementations. Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 236-252.
Erten, P. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının 21. yüzyıl becerileri yeterlilik algıları ve bu becerilerin kazandırılmasına yönelik görüşleri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(227), 33-64. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1232057
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design-based science and real-world problem solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038165
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age. The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report. Springer Open.
Gökbayrak, S. (2017). Fen teknoloji mühendislik ve matematik (STEM) uygulamalarının fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının STEM farkındalık düzeyleri, entegre STEM öğretimi yönelimi ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi. (Yüksek lisans tezi). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Güllü, H., & Akçay, A. O. (2022). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin 21. yüzyıl becerileri ile FETEMM farkındalıkları arasindaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Uşak üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 15(1), 1-15. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1215289
Hacıoğlu, Y., & Gülhan, F. (2021). The effects of STEM education on the students’ critical thinking skills and STEM perceptions. Journal of Education in Science Environment and health, 7(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.771331
Han, J., Kelley, T., & Knowles, J. G. (2021). Factors influencing student STEM learning: Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, 21st century skills, and career awareness. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4(2), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.52889/ijses.v3i1.137
Haridza, R., & Irving, K. E. (2017). The evolution of Indonesian and American science education curriculum : A comparison study. International Journal for Educational Studies, 9, 95-110. https://www.journals.mindamas.com/index.php/educare/article/view/802
Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2017, Mayıs). Üniversite öğrencilerinin FeTeMM farkındalık durumlarının incelenmesi. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Afyon.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Hom, E. J. (2014). What is STEM education?. http://www.livescience.com/43296-whatis-stem-education.html
Huri, N. H. D., & Karpudewan, M. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of Integrated STEM-lab activities in improving secondary school students’ understanding of electrolysis. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 495-508. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00021F
Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D., & Carberry, A. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=ncete_publications
Jia, Y., Oh, Y. J., Sibuma, B., LaBanca, F., & Lorentson, M. (2016). Measuring twenty-first century skills: development and validation of a scale for in-service and pre-service teachers. Teacher Development, 20(2), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1143870
Jolly, A. (2014). Six characteristics of a great STEM lesson. Education Week, 1-11. http://www.ikzadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/6-Characteristics_Great-STEM-Lesson.pdf
Karatepe, R. (2021). Öğretmen adaylarının 21. yüzyıl becerileri özyeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. Uluslararası İnovatif Eğitim Araştırmacısı, 1(2) 79-87. https://web.archive.org/web/20220106092552id_/https://iedres.com/files/iedres/a5168546-cf0b-4462-8d91-eeb1f8ea5852.pdf
Karisan, D., Macalalag, A., & Johnson, J. (2019). The effect of methods course on preservice teachers' awareness and intentions of teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Subject. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 22-35. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1198055.pdf
Kartini, F. S., Widodo, A., Winarno, N., & Astuti, L. (2021). Promoting student's problem-solving skills through STEM project-based Learning in Earth Layer and Disasters topic. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 257-266. https://10.17509/jsl.v4i3.27555
Kennedy, J., Lee, E., & Fontecchio, A. (2016, October). STEAM approach by integrating the arts and STEM through origami in K-12. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044508.pdf
Keskin, İ., & Yazar, T. (2015). Examining digital competence of teachers within the context of lifelong learning based on of the twenty-first century skills. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 1691-1711. https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3503
Koçulu, A., Topçu, M., & Çiftçi, A. (2022). The effect of STEM education on pre-service science teachers’ perceptions of 21st century skills and competences and problem solving skills. Open Journal For Educational Research (OJER), 6(2), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0602.05165k
Koyunlu Ünlü, Z., & Dökme, İ. (2022). A systematic review of 5E model in science education: proposing a skill-based STEM instructional model within the 21-st century skills. International Journal of Science Education, 44(13), 2110-2130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2114031
Kozikoğlu, İ., & Altunova, N. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının 21. yüzyıl becerilerine ilişkin öz-yeterlik algılarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerini yordama gücü. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 3, 522-531. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2018.293
Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002
Lin, K. Y., & Williams, P. J. (2017). Two-stage hands-on technology activity to develop preservice teachers’ competency in applying science and mathematics concepts. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9340-1
Martindill, D., & Wilson, E. (2015). Rhetoric or reality? A case study into how, if at all, practical work supports learning in the classroom. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-01-2014-0002
Marulcu, İ., & Sungur, K. (2012). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının mühendis ve mühendislik algılarının ve yöntem olarak mühendislik-dizayna bakış açılarının incelenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 13-23. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/18393
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). London: Pearson.
Ministry of National Education [MEB], (2018). İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. Ankara.
Morgan, J. R., Moon, A. M., & Barroso, L. R. (2013). Engineering better projects. In STEM project-based learning (pp. 29-39). Brill Sense.
Morrison, J. S. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The students, the academy, the classroom. TIES STEM Education Monograph Series.
Murat, A. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının 21. yüzyıl becerileri yeterlik algıları ile STEM'e yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
Özdemir, S. (2016). STEM eğitimi için görüşler. Ankara.
Öztürk, S. C. (2018). STEM eğitiminin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme ve eleştirel düşünme becerileri üzerine etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi, Erzincan.
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS kullanma kılavuzu: SPSS ile adım adım veri analizi (Balcı S., & Ahi B., çev.). Ankara, Turkey: Anı Yayıncılık
Partnership for 21st Century Learning [P21], (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
Purzer, Ş., Moore, T. J., Baker, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Supporting the Implementation of NGSS through Research. Purzer, Ş., Moore, TJ, Baker, D., and Berland, L. Supporting the Implementation of NGSS Through Research.(NRST). https://www.narst.org/ngsspapers/Engineering_June2014.pdf
Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Integrating science with technology, engineering, and mathematics. Taylor & Francis.
Rinke, C. R., Gladstone‐Brown, W., Kinlaw, C. R., & Cappiello, J. (2016). Characterizing STEM teacher education: Affordances and constraints of explicit STEM preparation for elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12185
Rockland, R., Bloom, D. S., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., Hirsch, L. S., & Kimmel, H. (2010). Advancing the “E” in K-12 STEM education. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 53-64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ906161.pdf
Rogers, R. R., Winship, J., & Sun, Y. (2016). Systematic support for STEM pre-service teachers: An authentic and sustainable four-pillar professional development model. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Leadership and personnel management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (Vol. III, pp. 1317–1333). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Rohali, P. A., Qadar, R., & Syam, M. (2023). The Effect of the STEM-PBL Learning on Students’ learning outcomes on optical concepts. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 3(1), 184-194. https://doi.org/10.52889/ijses.v3i1.137
Şahin, B. (2019). STEM etkinliklerinin fen öğretmeni adaylarının STEM farkındalıkları, tutumları ve görüşleri üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Bartın Üniversitesi, Düzce.
Şahiner, E. (2020). Mühendislik tasarım süreci etkinliklerinin sınıf öğretmen adaylarının Fen Teknoloji Mühendislik Matematik (FeTeMM) farkındalıklarına ve mühendis algılarına etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Yozgat.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/51616
Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8
Stewart, G. (2013). Physics: Leading the way in STEM education. The Physics Teacher, 51(5), 263-263. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4801347
Stohlmann, M. S., Roehrig, G. H., & Moore, T. J. (2014). The need for STEM teacher education development. In STEM Education: How to Train 21st Century Teachers (pp. 17-32). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Sungur Gül, K., & Saylan Kırmızıgül, A. (2022). Algodoo based STEM education: A case study of pre-service science teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11348-2
Sütçü, N. D., & Sütçü, K. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının 21. yüzyıl becerileri yeterlik algılarının C&RT analizi ile incelenmesi. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(2), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1035968
Tabar, V. (2018). Ülkemizde Fetemm alanında yapılmış olan çalışmaların içerik analizi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van.
Tekbıyık, A., & Çakmakçı, G. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretimi ve STEM etkinlikleri kitabı. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Tekerek, B., & Karakaya, F. (2018). STEM education awareness of pre-service science teachers. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(2), 348-359. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1258907.pdf
Tekin, S. (2020). Mühendislik temelli robotik uygulamalarını içeren STEM eğitiminin eleştirel düşünme ve mesleki tercihlerine etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi, Erzincan.
Thomazinho, H. C. S., L'Erario, A., & Fabri, J. A. (2017). Teaching software maintenance with ludic techniques supported by robotics. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Turkish Industry and Business Association [TUSIAD], (2017). Türkiye’nin Sanayide Dijital Dönüşüm Yetkinliği, Türkiye’nin 4. Sanayi Devrimi. The Boston Consulting Group. https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/9864-tusiad-bcg-turkiye-nin-sanayide%20dijitaldonusum-yetkinligi
Üçüncüoğlu, G. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarına yönelik STEM odaklı labaratuvar uygulamalarının tasarlanması ve etkililiğinin araştırılması. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sinop Üniversitesi, Sinop.
Ünlü-Koyunlu, Z., & Dere, Z. (2019). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının FeTeMM farkındalıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.481586
Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., ... & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643
Van Eck, R. N., Guy, M., Young, T., Winger, A. T., & Brewster, S. (2015). Project NEO: A video game to promote STEM competency for preservice elementary teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(3), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9245-9
Wagner, T. I. (2008). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need—and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Wendell, K. B. (2008). The theoretical and empirical basis for design-based science instruction for children. Qualifying Paper, Tufts University
Wilson, S. M. (2011). Effective STEM teacher preparation, induction, and professional development. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/STEM_Schools_Workshop_Paper_Wilson.pdf
Yaşar, E. B. (2021). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin 21. yüzyıl becerileri öz yeterlilik algıları ve Stem tutumlarının incelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Kırıkkale.
Yılmaz, A., Gülgün, C., & Çağlar, A. (2017). 7. sınıf öğrencilerine “Kuvvet ve Enerji” ünitesinin STEM uygulamaları ile öğretimi: Paraşüt, su jeti, mancınık, akıllı perde ve hidrolik iş makinası (kepçe) yapalım etkinliği. Journal of Current Researches on Educational Studies, 7(1), 97-116. https://asosindex.com.tr/index.jsp?modul=articles-page&journal-id=1472&article-id=77615#cite
Yükseköğretim Kurulu, Y. Ö. K. (2018). Öğretmen Yetiştirme Lisans Programları. Retrived from https://www. yok. gov. tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/AA_Sunus_% 20Onsoz_Uygulama_Yonergesi. pdf (Retrieved on 13.01. 2020.).
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
Zvoch, K., Letourneau, L. E., & Spaniol-Mathews, P. (2023). The Effect of Supplementary Instruction on STEM Course Performance. American Journal of Distance Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2023.2165355
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i3.54992
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ozlem Oktay, Gülşen Koçak, Sabriye Seven
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia